Nos 4789 4790’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 1994
1 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Kearney · Columbian National Life Insurance v. McClain · Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. R. E. Parsons Electric Co. · Marsh v. Concord Mutual Fire Insurance · 148 Pa. Super. 77 - Schock v. Penn Township Mutual Fire Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * When a renewal policy is issued, it is presumed, unless a contrary intention appears, that the parties intended to adopt in the renewal policy the terms, conditions and coverage of the expiring policies.” Pearl Assur. Co. v. School Dist. No. 1 In San Miguel County, Colo., 10 Cir., 212 F.2d 778, 782 (1954).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“construed most strongly against the insurer who prepared it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.