Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 F.2d 82 - Roberts v. Eaton

Roberts v. Eaton’s Empirical Analysis

212 F.2d 82 · 1954

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 2006
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2006 · most notably Kern County Land Company v. Occidental Petroleum Corporation (1973), Blau v. Mission Corp. (1954)

40 federal appellate · 1 district ·

230195419601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78P (§ 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Park & Tilford, Inc. v. Schulte · Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc. · Blau v. Mission Corp. · Scocozza v. Erie Railroad · Shaw v. Dreyfus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[L]ike treatment of all stockholders will in most cases remove the possibility of abuse.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In Park & Tilford v. Schulte, * * *, we held that voluntary conversion of convertible preferred stock into common was a ‘purchase.’ ” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““the acquisition resulted in the insider holding a different proportional interest in the issuer.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.