In Re: Gerald E. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
July 2016
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Patterson v. Shumate · In re Walton · Stuart v. Koch · Hagel v. Drummond (In Re Hagel) · In Re Morse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fact that a pension is exempt from the reach of creditors does not preclude a bankruptcy court from finding that the pension is also disposable income for purposes of Chapter 13. The question of whether income from a pension is exempt from creditors is a wholly independent inquiry from the question of whether the pension income is reasonably necessary to support the debt- or.... The latter question is the pertinent inquiry for purposes of Chapter 13. See Koch, 109 F.3d at 1289 . In regard to the former question, we note that nothing in the language of Chapter 13 prevents the funding of a Chapter 13 plan with exempt income.... Hence the question of whether a pension plan is exempt or otherwise restricted by a federal anti-alienation provision is irrelevant in a Chapter 13 context.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Shields
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.