Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 FAPPX 281 - McCullough v. Kirkum

McCullough v. Kirkum’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 2013
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Monge v. California · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Courts have also adopted different tests for determining whether an employee is a supervisor or a co-worker”)(citing Parkins v. Civ. Constr. of Ill., 163 F.3d 1027, 1034 (7th Cir. 1998) (individual considered supervisor if he has “the authority to affect the terms and conditions of the victim’s employment”); and Mack v. Otis Elevator Co., 326 F.3d 116, 126-27 (2d Cir.2003) (rejecting Parkins’ test and holding that individual may be considered a supervisor if he has authority to direct employee's day-to-day work activities)); see also Deborah F. Buckman, Annotation, Who is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.