Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 FRD 539 - In re Paxil Litigation

In re Paxil Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

4 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts · Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp. · Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether, and to what extent, Paxil causes discontinuation symptoms varies from patient to patient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.