Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

212 F. Supp. 2d 1339

Austin v. Haley

U.S. District Court

Decided July 25, 2002

U.S. District Court · decided 2002-07-25

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2004

Relies on Hope v. Pelzer · 15 F. Supp. 2d 1210 - Austin v. Hopper

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-07-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

¶2 Counsel for defendant Michael Haley having indicated during a conference on July 24, 2002, that, in light of Hope v. Pelzer, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2508, 153 L.Ed.2d 666 (2002), the Alabama Department of Corrections does not intend to resume use of the hitching post or restraining bar, it is ORDERED that any additional relief in this litigation is unnecessary and thus is denied. Austin v. Hopper, 15 F.Supp.2d 1210, 1272-1274 (M.D.Ala.1998) (discussing what additional relief, if any, might be appropriate).

¶3 It is further ORDERED that the plaintiffs are allowed until August 7, 2002, to file any request for attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs.

/212/fsupp2d/1339 · .json · Public domain