Frobouck v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “that he received evidence about the crime from a confidential informant, that the informant's information put him on the trail of [Zemo] and other suspects, that other parts of the informant's information were corroborated and turned out to be correct, and that, acting on the informant's information, he arrested [Zemo].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 235 Md. App. 484 - Hallowell v. State

2. “objecting to ... a sustained and deliberate line of inquiry that can have had no other purpose than to put before the jury an entire body of information that was none of the jury's business.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 235 Md. App. 484 - Hallowell v. State

3. “not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted-that there was a 'marijuana grow'-but, rather, to explain briefly what brought the officers to the scene in the first place.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 235 Md. App. 484 - Hallowell v. State