Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 MICH 243 - Thomas Canning Co. v. Johnson

Thomas Canning Co. v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
April 1974
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roehm v. Horst · Anvil Min Co v. Humble · Cofrode v. Gartner · Wigent v. Marrs · Goodrich v. City of Detroit

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whenever one party thereto is guilty of such a breach as is here attributed to the defendant, the other party is at liberty to treat the contract as broken and desist from any further effort on his part to perform; in other words, he may abandon it, and recover as damages the profits which he would have received through full performance. Such an abandonment is not technically a rescission of the contract, but is merely an acceptance of the situation which the wrongdoing of the other party has brought about.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.