Greene v. Mathiowetz’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 1976
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Steinbauer v. Stone · Mahowald v. Beckrich · State v. Connelly · Sassen v. Haegle · Dehen v. Berning
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * Inaccuracy in expression, failure to instruct on every possible hypothesis, or inadequate treatment of some phase of the law applicable to the controversy does not, as a rule, entitle a party to take advantage thereof upon the motion for a new trial where, had the shortcoming in the charge been called to the attention of the court by an exception or suggestion before the jury retired, we might readily assume that the court would have promptly corrected the inadvertence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Satter v. Turner“No person shall drive a motor vehicle at such a slow speed as to impede or block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic except when reduced speed is necessary for safe operation or in compliance with law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Satter v. Turner“* * * And if counsel thought the reading of these statutes was harmful to plaintiff's cause, in fairness to the court and opposing counsel, attention should have been called thereto promptly to avoid error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Satter v. Turner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.