Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 Minn. 205 - Sexton v. Baehr

Sexton v. Baehr’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1957
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bauman v. Metzger · Boyle v. Vanderhoof · Gossen v. Township of Borgholm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An action for the recovery of wages or money due for manual labor may be brought in the county in which such labor was performed; and when so brought the venue of such action shall not be changed to another county without the written consent of the plaintiff filed with the court.” (Italics supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * In a revision a change in phraseology or punctuation is presumed to be intended to simplify the language of the prior act, not to change its meaning.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.