Vascoe v. FORD’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 1984
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pan-American Petroleum Corp. v. Pate · Bonelli v. Branciere · J. J. Newman Lumber Co. v. Norris · Koestler v. Burton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“4. All mental pain and anguish, if any Plaintiff has suffered as a proximate result of said injuries, if any. 5. Sadness, humiliation, and embarrassment ensuing from any scars or disfigurement sustained as a proximate result of said injury, if any. 6. All physical pain and suffering which you believe from the evidence Plaintiff will suffer in the future, if any, as a proximate result of said injuries, if any.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.