Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

212 N.C. 251

193 S.E 14

Sorrells v. . Decker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1937

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1937-10-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1940

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1937-10-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Cueiam.

¶1 Tbe only exceptions noted at tbe trial and brought forward in tbe assignments of error relate to tbe judge’s charge to tbe jury. Tbe portions excepted to contained statements of tbe contentions of tbe parties and tbe evidence supporting. If there were any inadvertence on tbe part of tbe judge in these recitals, bis attention should have been called to it at tbe time so that correction, if deemed important, might have been made. S. v. Sinodis, 189 N. C., 565; S. v. Barnhill, 186 N. C., 446. Tbe controversy presented issues of fact which have been resolved against tbe defendant.

¶2 , In tbe trial, we find

¶3 No error.

WiNBOENE, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case.
/212/nc/251 · .json · Public domain