212 N.C. App. 426 - Jessee v. Jessee’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · In Re the Appeal From the Civil Penalty · Goldston v. American Motors Corp. · Anderson v. Hollifield · Travco Hotels, Inc. v. PIEDMONT NAT. GAS CO., INC.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The ordinary test for determining whether or not the parties and causes are the same for the purpose of abatement by reason of the pendency of the prior action is this: Do the two actions present a substantial identity as to parties, subject matter, issues involved, and relief demanded?”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'Under the law of this state, where a prior action is pending between the same parties for the same subject matter in a court within the state having like jurisdiction, the prior action serves to abate the subsequent action.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“essentially the same questions as the outmoded plea of abatement,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.