Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 N.C. App. 502 - State v. Merrell

212 N.C. App. 502 - State v. Merrell’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Caddell · State v. Mash · State v. Cummings · State v. Bunn · State v. . Cureton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[P]roduce[s] substantial evidence which would support a conclusion by the trial court that at the time of the crime for which he is being tried [the] defendant's mind and reason were so completely intoxicated and overthrown as to render him utterly incapable of forming [the requisite intent to commit the crime.] In the absence of some evidence of intoxication to such degree, the court is not required to charge the jury thereon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.