212 N.C. App. 614 - Maxwell v. Maxwell’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · Goldston v. American Motors Corp. · 132 N.C. App. 341 - Hudson-Cole Development Corp. v. Beemer · 10 N.C. App. 545 - In Re Custody of Stancil · 52 N.C. App. 203 - Falls v. Falls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Adkins , the trial court found that the defendant had the present means to comply with a court order and purge himself of a finding of contempt. On appeal, this Court reviewed the record evidence and held that the unspecific finding of a present means to comply was sufficient in light of competent evidence presented in support of the findings . Similarly, in the present action, though the trial court's finding as to Plaintiff's ability [to comply] with the contempt order is unspecific, there was competent evidence in the record to support the trial court's finding of fact. Accordingly, Plaintiff's argument on appeal is without merit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tigani v. Tigani“we reverse and remand this matter for further findings of fact as to Plaintiff's fitness as a parent or the best interest of the minor children”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.