212 N.J. Super. 557 - Monte v. Monte’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Jeffcoat v. Jeffcoat (1994), 245 N.J. Super. 354 - Aronson v. Aronson (1991)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lepis v. Lepis · Rothman v. Rothman · Painter v. Painter · Stern v. Stern · Curtis v. Finneran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, if the debt resulted because the husband intentionally dissipated marital assets `such intentional dissipation is no more than a fraud on marital rights,' and the debt will not be charged to the wife.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“one cannot find himself in, and choose to remain in, a position where he has diminished or no earning capacity and expect to be relieved of or to be able to ignore the obligations of support to one's family.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Generally speaking, in dividing marital assets the court must take into account the liabilities as well as the assets of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.