Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 P3D 558 - State v. Hughes

State v. Hughes’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Blockburger v. United States · Ball v. United States · 125 Wash. 2d 769 - State v. Calle · In Re Orange

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clearly indicated its intent that the same conduct or transaction will not be punished under both statutes.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[r]egardless of whether nonconsent is proved by the age of the victim and the age differential between the victim and the perpetrator or by the mental incapacity or physical helplessness of the victim, both statutes protect individuals who are unable to consent by reason of their status.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “our courts have specifically recognized that the legislature did not intend one act of sexual intercourse to violate both the rape and statutory rape provision of our code.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.