Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 So. 2d 166 - Kemper v. Doyal

212 So. 2d 166 - Kemper v. Doyal’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2004

5 state decisions

3019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 134 So. 2d 384 - Turner v. Brown · Artigue v. Artigue · 148 So. 2d 326 - Barber v. Lake Charles Pipe and Supply Company · Mossler Acceptance Co. v. Moliere · 125 So. 2d 657 - Wiseman v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the findings of the board of review as to the facts, if supported by sufficient evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of the court shall be confined to questions of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.