Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 So. 3d 643 - State v. Chambers

212 So. 3d 643 - State v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp. · 851 So. 2d 921 - State v. Tate · 436 So. 2d 464 - State v. Chism

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he trial judge has much discretion in ruling on a motion for a new trial and, upon review, an appellate court may only set aside the judgment upon a finding that the trial judge exercised his discretion in an arbitrary manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.