Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 SW 656 - Taylor v. White

Taylor v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
February 1981
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 1981 · most notably Brown v. Lundell (1961), Cameron Compress Co. v. Whitington (1926)

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

7019191920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coin v. John H. Talge Lounge Co. · Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Bingle · Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. Alexander · Hilje v. Hettich · Taylor v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The measure of care required of the master is that degree of care which an ordinarily prudent person engaged in the same kind of business would have exercised under like or similar circumstances. The best evidence of the degree of care which an ordinarily prudent person would have exercised under given circumstances is the degree of care which ordinarily prudent persons engaged in the same kind of business customarily have exercised and commonly do exercise under like circumstances.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the custom of others engaged in like business is not the absolute test of negligence,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.