Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 U.S. 445 - Frederic L. Grant Shoe Co. v. W. M. Laird Co.

Frederic L. Grant Shoe Co. v. W. M. Laird Co.’s Empirical Analysis

212 U.S. 445 · 1909

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
18
cited 18 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
July 1990
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 20 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions (18 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1990 · most notably Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1915), Central Trust Co. v. Chicago Auditorium Ass'n (1916)

31 federal appellate · 20 district · 12 state decisions

3001909191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Burke · Tindle v. Birkett · Schuchardt v. Allens · C. H. Nichols Lumber Co. v. Franson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Provable claims, on which a petition to have the debtor adjudicated a bankrupt under section 5!>b of the bankruptcy act can lie based, are claims Piar can be proved in the proceedings, and a liquidation may be ordered on the filing of the petition to ascertain whether the petition is based on a provable claim.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “pursuant to application to the court, be liquidated in such manner as it shall direct, and may thereafter be proved and allowed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “founded upon a contract, express or implied,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.