Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

212 U.S. 563

Docket No. 238.

Docket No. 239.

Docket No. 240.

Chicago & Alton Railway Co. v. United States

Full caption · 3 consolidated cases

  • CHICAGO & ALTON RAILWAY COMPANYv.UNITED STATES JOHN N
  • FAITHORNv.UNITED STATES FRED A
  • WANNv.UNITED STATES

Supreme Court of the United States

January 4, 1909.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1909-01-04

2 counsel of record

Relies on Johnson v. Tennessee · Spokane Valley Land & Water Co. v. Madson

Cited in Bouvier (1914)’s definition of “Rebate”

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1909-01-04

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1993

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

801909191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Messrs. F. S. Winston, Robert Mather, John Barton Payne, S. H. Strawn, Ralph M. Shaw, and Blackburn Esterline for petitioners.

The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for respondent.

¶1

Judgments affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.

/212/us/563 · .json · Public domain