Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 VA 205 - Powell v. Troland

Powell v. Troland’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2009

9 state decisions

401971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc. · Fauver v. Bell · Daily v. Somberg · Selby v. Kuhns · Wheat v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he general rule is that if an injured person uses ordinary care in selecting a physician for treatment of his injury, the law regards the aggravation of the injury resulting from the negligent act of the physician as a part of the immediate and direct damages which naturally flow from the original injury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is well settled that where there has been an acceptance of satisfaction of a judgment recovered, it has the same effect as a release. It operates to extinguish a plaintiff’s cause of action against other joint tortfeasors liable for the same injury and bars an action against them though the wrongdoers are severally rather than jointly liable for the injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In Powell v. Purks, the plaintiff proved the entire consequences of both the automobile accident and the subsequent medical treatment, including Dr. Troland’s neurological operation. The trial court found that it was obvious from its verdict that the jury took the whole picture into account in arriving at the award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.