Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 VA 520 - Cabbler v. Commonwealth

Cabbler v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2020 · most notably South Dakota v. Opperman (1976), 6 Va. App. 507 - Servis v. Commonwealth (1988)

9 federal appellate · 70 state decisions — followed in 18 states

460197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Ker v. State of California · Preston v. United States · Cooper v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It has always been the public policy of the Commonwealth to preserve and protect the individual rights of its citizens. Public policy also dictates that a citizen's rights in his property shall likewise be preserved and protected. Thus it would appear, and we so hold, that the policy established and the procedure followed by the Roanoke Police Department to protect the property of a citizen arrested away from his home in possession of property where no other immediate means is available for safekeeping of such property are reasonable and in accord with the public policy of the Commonwealth....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in accord with the public policy of the Commonwealth, [was] not violative of the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights and serve[d] the best interest of the property owner by protecting and safeguarding the property in his possession at the time of his arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “as to partially block the ambulance driveway leading to the hospital emergency entrance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.