Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 WIS 30 - Bishop v. Genz

Bishop v. Genz’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2000

6 state decisions

3019331940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cross v. Allen · Regan v. Williams · Barry v. Minahan · Bergmann v. Roll · Coleman v. Ward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is elementary that a statute of limitations begins to run against a remedy at the time when the cause of action accrues, and that ‘a cause of action accrues where there exists a claim capable of present enforcement, a suable party against whom it may be enforced, and a party who has a present right to enforce it.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.