212 Wis. 2d 203 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2004
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Old Chief v. United States · 124 Wis. 2d 525 - State v. Dyess · 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · 102 Wis. 2d 58 - Hartung v. Hartung · 155 Wis. 2d 633 - State v. Pulizzano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In actions under s. 940.225, 948.02, 948.025 or 948.095, evidence which is admissible under s. 972.11(2) must be determined by the court upon pretrial motion to be material to a fact at issue in the case and of sufficient probative value to outweigh its inflammatory and prejudicial nature before it may be introduced at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[w]hen one party attempts to exploit evidence which has been declared out of bounds, the doctrine of curative admissibility permits a trial court to cure the error by having the other party respond with its own version of the inadmissible evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. GOCKER“And you're offering here, for the motive for why she wants to do that, the fact that she had some disagreement over finances with you in the home?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.