Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 Ala. 695 - Maddox v. Johnson

Maddox v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1938
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mobile Transportation Co. v. City of Mobile · Adams v. Bibby · Briel v. Exchange Nat. Bank · Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Burke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A mere general assertion of diligence has been held to be an insufficient showing in that behalf. L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Burke, 198 Ala. 99 , 73 So. 416 . A fortiori, a mere general assertion that reasonable diligence could not have discovered the evidence is likewise insufficient.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.