State v. Roque’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 186 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 201 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2025 · most notably 134 S. Ct. 1986 - Hall v. Florida (2014), State v. Morris (2007)
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 186 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Blakely v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Ring v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 201 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the defendant achieves a full-scale score of 70 or below on any one of the tests, then the court proceeds to a hearing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Ryan · Hall v. Florida“[E]ven if there [is] no error or an error [is] harmless and so by itself does not warrant reversal, an incident may nonetheless contribute to a finding of persistent and pervasive misconduct if the cumulative effect of the incidents shows that the prosecutor intentionally engaged in improper conduct and “did so with indifference, if not a specific intent, to prejudice the defendant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morris“A Batson challenge proceeds in three steps: (1) the party challenging the strikes must make a prima facie showing of discrimination; (2) the striking party must provide a race-neutral reason for the strike; and (3) if a race-neutral explanation is provided, the trial court must determine whether the challenger has carried its burden of proving purposeful racial discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bustamante
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.