Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 Ark. 1019 - Nance v. Eiland

Nance v. Eiland’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 1979
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 1979

12 state decisions

401948195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. Spires · Feldman v. Fox · Life & Casualty Co. v. Sanders · Nakdimen v. First National Bank · Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Rogers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is always within the sound discretion of the court to permit a complaint to be amended to conform to the proof; and where the allegations in the complaint are insufficient, it is proper at the conclusion of the evidence to treat the complaint as amended to conform to the proof, where there are no objections to the introduction of the evidence 1 and no claim of surprise is made.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.