Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 Ark. 282 - Pugh v. Camp

Pugh v. Camp’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
February 1967
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barrentine v. Henry Wrape Co. · Sykes v. Carmack · Scott v. Wisconsin & Arkansas Lumber Co. · Home Fire Insurance v. Wray · Andrews v. Cox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that a verdict should be directed against a party only when there is no evidence tending to establish an issue in his favor, when viewed in the most favorable light to him. Barrentine v. Henry Wrape Co., 120 Ark. 206 , 179 S. W. 328 . Or, stating it another way, ‘If there is any evidence tending to establish an issue in favor of a party, it is error to direct a verdict against him.’ Headnote 1, Scott v. Wisconsin & Ark. Lbr. Co., 148 Ark. 66 , 229 S. W. 720 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.