Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 Ark. 507 - Martin v. State

Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1991
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 45 U.S.C. § 51 (Federal Employers' Liability Act)

Relies on Palko v. State of Connecticut · Adamson v. People of State of California · Minneapolis St Louis Railroad Company v. George Bombolis · Ex parte King · Ex Parte Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A criminal charge is treated as evidence of delinquency when established. Felonious conduct and misdemeanors are not dealt with as such, but are considered only in determining what is best for the minor when all of the circumstances of birth, environment, opportunity, habit and demonstrated tendencies are measured.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We quite agree with counsel for appellant that if the Juvenile Court Act were a substitute for prosecution, and that punishment as for a crime attended the exercise of jurisdiction, there would be an invasion of the defendant’s right to trial by jury, guaranteed by Sec. 7 of Art. 2 of the Constitution of 1874.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.