People v. Leney’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 63 Cal. 2d 822 - Kellett v. Superior Court · 45 Cal. 3d 306 - People v. Poggi · People v. Bostick · 70 Cal. 2d 8 - In Re McKinney · 16 Cal. 3d 341 - Griggs v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An accusatory pleading may charge two or more different offenses connected together in their commission, or different statements of the same offense or two or more different offenses of the same class of crime or offenses, under separate counts, and if two or more accusatory pleadings are filed in such cases in the same court, the court may order them to be consolidated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Offenses are of the same class when they possess common attributes.... [Citation.] Crimes are of the same class when they all involve assaultive crimes against the person. [Citation.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.