Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 CALAPP4TH 289 - Chalmers v. Hirschkop

Chalmers v. Hirschkop’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Troxel v. Granville · 2 Cal. 4th 556 - Burden v. Snowden · 11 Cal. 4th 274 - Trope v. Katz · In Re Marriage of Burgess · 14 Cal. 3d 604 - In Re Marriage of Mix

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not demonstrated that she complied with any of the requirements of section 217”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A party seeking to present live testimony from witnesses other than the parties shall, prior to the hearing, file and serve a witness list with a brief description of the anticipated testimony. If the witness list is not served prior to the hearing, the court may, on request, grant a brief continuance and may make appropriate temporary orders pending the continued hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “courts' holdings that evidentiary rulings do not apply to postjudgment motions were decided prior to the enactment of section 217.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.