Betts v. Bisher’s Empirical Analysis
213 F. 581 · 1914
Citation profile
3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1951
3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on White v. Ewing · Gableman v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. · McNulta v. Lochridge · United States v. Missouri K T Ry Co · Hanlon v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““11 should be added that while these actions against receivers may be brought in other courts, they may nevertheless also be brought in the court by which the receiver was appointed, Inasmuch as the judgments recovered are payable from ilie property or funds in the course of administration, and the actions may be regarded as ancillary in the sense of subordination to such administration.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matarazzo v. Hustis““Where a receiver of a corporation was appointed by a federal court, an action against the receiver for injuries to an employs was maintainable in such court, though there was no federal question involved nt»r diversity of citizenship.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matarazzo v. Hustis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.