Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
213 F.2d 122 · 1954
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Jaffee v. United States (1979), Woodard v. Sage Products, Inc. (1987)
43 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Hurn v. Oursler · Morgenstern Chemical Co. v. Schering Corp. · Musher Foundation, Inc. v. Alba Trading Co. · Pang-Tsu Mow v. Republic of China
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury or with an advisory jury, the court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon * * *; and in granting or refusing interlocutory injunctions the court shall similarly set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law which constitute the grounds of its action. * * *.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alberti v. Cruise“to allow appeals from orders other than final judgments when they have a final and irreparable effect on the rights of the parties,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.