Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 F.2d 278 - Meyer v. United States

Meyer v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

213 F.2d 278 · 1954

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
April 1984
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently April 1984 · most notably United States v. Snow (1955), Tunnell v. United States (1958)

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

2601954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 117 · 26 U.S.C. § 182 · 26 U.S.C. § 183 · 26 U.S.C. § 24 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)

Relies on Watson v. Commissioner · Williams v. McGowan · Swiren v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The government has urged that this taxpayer has ‘realized’ partnership profits for the July to February period in question. And it might also be argued that as to this taxpayer, he had a right to his distributive share of the partnership profits when they were accrued. But we find he sold out his entire partnership interest, quit the firm, and disposed of a capital asset. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.