Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 F.2d 405 - Silverman v. United States

Silverman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

213 F.2d 405 · 1954

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
April 2013
most recently cited

67 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably United States v. Bohonus (1980), United States v. Regent Office Supply Co. (1970)

67 federal appellate · 3 district ·

3101954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Durland v. United States · Harrison v. United States · Kaufmann v. United States · Fournier v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f a scheme is devised with the intent to defraud, and the mails are used in executing the scheme, the fact that there is no misrepresentation of a single existing fact makes no difference. It is only necessary to prove that it is a scheme reasonably calculated to deceive persons of ordinary prudence and comprehension”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “All testimony tending to show good faith on the part of the appellant [appellants] was admitted in evidence, and the court was very careful to charge the jury upon the subject of good faith”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “reasonably calculated to deceive persons of ordinary prudence and comprehension.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.