National Labor Relations Board v. Mississippi Products, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
213 F.2d 670 · 1954
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 1978 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. Camco, Inc. (1965), National Labor Relations Board v. Birmingham Publishing Co. (1958)
26 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on International Ass'n of Machinists; Tool & Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Coach Co. · Sax v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Arthur Winer, Inc. · Wayside Press, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In determining whether any person is acting as an agent of the employer, the question of whether the specific acts performed were actually authorized or subsequently ratified is not controlling.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.