Pedreiro v. Shaughnessy’s Empirical Analysis
213 F.2d 768 · 1954
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2003
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1009 · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Williams v. Fanning · Brownell v. Rubinstein · Rubinstein v. Brownell · Clark v. United States · Belizaro v. Zimmerman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t sometimes seems that in the very areas of the law where simplicity and flexibility of procedure are most indispensable are found a morass of complexities. This case provides an illustration. 16”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“as comprehensive as it could be if the Attorney General had been joined.” Id. 10 . See also Rachel E. Rosenblum, Is the Attorney General the Custodian of an INS Detainee? Personal Jurisdiction and the “Immediate Custodian”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Walters v. Ashcroft
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.