Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

213 F.2d 771

Docket No. 4853.

Banning v. Looney

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1954.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1954-06-25

2 counsel of record

Relies on 149 Ohio St. 165 - Bell v. Dimmerling · Brenner v. Spiegle · 134 Ohio St. 192 - State Ex Rel. La Riccia v. Rosati

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1954-06-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1992

7 federal appellate ·

6019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Ralph M. Clarke, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

¶2Milton P. Beach, Asst. U. S. Atty., Oskaloosa, Kan. (William C. Farmer, U. S. Atty., Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and PICKETT, United States Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant is confined under judgment of conviction in the Federal Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. In substance his complaint in this proceeding is that his constitutional rights are being violated by the prison authorities, in that he is not permitted to process directly with the U. S. Patent Office an alleged invention which he claims to have developed. He complains that the prison rules and regulations require him to process the matter first through the office of Director of Bureau of Prisons. He also asked the trial court to inquire into his attempted escape record at Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, and to compel the prison authorities there to remove the “infamous lie” from his record.

¶6 Courts are without power to supervise prison administration or to interfere with the ordinary prison rules or regulations. Neither have we power to inquire with respect to the prisoner’s detention in the Lewisburg Prison. No authorities are needed to support those statements. The appeal is wholly without merit.

¶7Affirmed.

/213/f2d/771 · .json · Public domain