Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 F.2d 922 - United States ex rel. Elliott v. Hendricks

United States ex rel. Elliott v. Hendricks’s Empirical Analysis

213 F.2d 922 · 1954

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 1997 · most notably Daye v. Attorney General of New York (1982), Johnston v. Marsh (1955)

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

10019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Brown v. Allen · Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · Palko v. State of Connecticut

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * has been dealt with with such a lack of fairness that we may say he has not been given due process of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.