Thomas v. Dickel’s Empirical Analysis
213 F.3d 1023 · 2000
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Ornelas v. United States · Whren v. United States · United States v. Cortez · Delaware v. Prouse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause we have found that the officers' stop of the plaintiffs' car did not violate their fourth amendment [ ] rights, it follows that the plaintiffs' claim against the city (inadequate training and municipal custom) must likewise fail”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction ... if ... the district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the person stopped of criminal activity,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.