Sulit v. Schiltgen’s Empirical Analysis
213 F.3d 449 · 2000
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably Kwai Fun Wong v. United States (2004), Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Janet Reno, Attorney General (2000)
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Reno v. Flores · Janet Reno, Attorney General v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee et al. · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Miranda · Rashtabadi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]either the failure to inform an individual of his or her legal rights nor the negligent provision of misinformation constitute affirmative misconduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“decision or action by the Attorney General to commence proceedings, adjudicate cases, or execute removal orders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“affirmative conduct going beyond mere negligence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.