Wilson v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Parker v. Harris · Carroll v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Halloran v. Barnhart · Johnson v. Bowen · Balsamo v. Chater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a reason ... that relies on a mischaracterization of the record cannot be a good reason [for disregarding a treating source's opinion].”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“established that [the claimant] could not have 'significantly impaired concentration and persistence[.]' " Id. at 484-85 . The court noted that "[w]hile [the plaintiff] did testify that he used Sudoku or word puzzles to try to get his mind off his pain, he qualified this by stating that he could only focus on doing a puzzle about 10 to 15 minutes before he became frustrated by his pain.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“established that [the claimant] could not have 'significantly impaired concentration and persistence[.]'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.