Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 Ga. 90 - Sutton v. McMillan

Sutton v. McMillan’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably Cochran v. Murrah (1975), 132 Ga. App. 569 - Ely v. Stratoflex, Inc. (1974)

30 state decisions

1501957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Crawford · Smith v. Merck · Forlaw v. Augusta Naval Stores Co. · Johnson v. Sherrer · Larkins v. Boyd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Fraud will authorize equity to annul a deed no matter how solemnly executed. A mere failure to comply with a promise on the part of a grantee is insufficient to establish fraudulent intent. However, where the petition alleges an oral promise by the grantee to perform an act in the future as the inducement or consideration for the execution of the deed by the grantor and where the promise was made with the present intention on the part of the grantee not to comply with it, such petition sets forth a cause of action for cancellation. . Appellee’s amended petition clearly alleges that the appellant made an oral promise to perform an act which was a part of the consideration for the execution of the deed and that the appellant had no intention from the beginning to comply with his promise, (citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.