Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 Ga. App. 352 - State v. Peters

213 Ga. App. 352 - State v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2020

17 state decisions

701994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trammel v. United States · State v. Williams · City of Jesup v. Bennett · Higgs v. State · State v. Strickman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “essentially incorporated the common-law rule [that] spouses were neither competent nor compellable to testify. An exception was created providing that a wife was competent but not compellable to testify against her husband for a criminal offense upon her person. This exception later was expanded to include a criminal offense committed by either spouse upon the other.... Finally, subsection (b) was added in 1987, providing that the privilege shall not apply where the husband or wife is charged with a crime against the person of a minor child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Allegations that a marriage was contracted solely for the purpose of barring testimony have been considered by a number of state courts, and they have overwhelmingly declined to create such a judicial exception to the marital privilege.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “told her daughters she probably would have to marry [Mr.] Sargent so he would not testify against her.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.