Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 Ga. App. 407 - Walker v. State

213 Ga. App. 407 - Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Dutton v. Evans · United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8MM. Film · Mooney v. State · Gunter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of the confession of a co-defendant implicating a defendant cannot be admitted against that defendant at a joint trial where the co-defendant does not take the stand and is not available for cross examination. [Cits.] The implication of another defendant must be direct. It is not a Bruton violation if the redacted confession identifies the defendant only through the jury's making connections with other evidence and drawing inferences. [Cit.] The statements standing alone must clearly inculpate the defendant. [Cits.] Owens v. State, 193 Ga.App. 661, 662 (3) ( 388 SE2d 712 ) (1989). As in Owens , the co-defendant's statements were not inculpatory of [Ford].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.