Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 Kan. 178 - State v. Newman

State v. Newman’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1979
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Johnson · JAY-OX, INC. v. Square Deal Junk Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . It is firmly established in this jurisdiction that reversible error cannot be predicated upon a complaint of misconduct of counsel in closing argument to the jury where no objection is lodged. (State v. Fleury, 203 Kan. 888 , 457 P. 2d 44 ; and State v. McDermott, 202 Kan. 399 , 449 P. 2d 545 , cert. den. 396 U. S. 912 , 24 L. Ed. 2d 187 , 90 S. Ct. 226 .)” (p. 297.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.