Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 Minn. 593 - Yess v. Ferch

Yess v. Ferch’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1965
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1965

5 state decisions

30194219501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Nyquist v. District Court of Swift County · State ex rel. D. S. B. Johnston Land Co. v. District Court · State Ex Rel. Goodin v. District Court · State Ex Rel. Schmidt v. Youngquist · State Ex Rel. Smith v. District Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * [T]he complaint alone must determine whether the action is by right triable in Hennepin County.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.