Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 N.C. 484 - Hare v. . Weil

Hare v. . Weil’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 1986
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 1986

12 state decisions

50193819401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Parties may (362) by parol rescind or by matter in pais abandon rights in land.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.